But high-risk pools also have a history of running into a big problem: They cost a ton of money. Pooling together the sickest patients means that a state high-risk pool will have really high medical claims. Experts have cautioned that the money allotted in the Republican bill would not be enough to cover all the people who needed insurance through a high-risk pool.
Obamacare currently restricts how much insurers can charge their oldest enrollees in the individual market. It says that insurers can only charge the oldest enrollee three times as much as the youngest, which pushes down premiums for those in their 50s and 60s. This used to be a group that faced prohibitively steep premiums on the individual market. The AHCA would get rid of that regulation, allowing insurers to charge their oldest enrollees up to five times as much as their youngest ones.
And while young people might have cheaper premiums and an easier ability to enroll, older Americans could struggle to purchase coverage in this market, where their costs would rise.
These are people who tend to have more urgent health care needs and could be in a worse position without health care than a young adult might be. The CBO estimated that this has been one of the least popular provisions of the bill. The Republican replacement, like Obamacare, envisions that Americans will use tax credits to purchase individual health insurance.
But the structure of the tax credits is very different. They would get enough money so that a midlevel plan would cost no more than 6. There is no cap on what they have to pay for insurance. The Republican plans would be based mostly on age and a bit on income. Those above the income threshold would have the help slowly phased out in 10 percent increments. The tax credits would be doled out this way:. On the surface, the tax credits for the oldest Americans seem the most generous.
People in their 60s, for example, get twice as much help as those in their 20s. But under the Republican plan, insurers would be allowed to charge the oldest Americans five times as much as the youngest Americans. Their financial help would not scale nearly as much as their premiums would. This new tax credit structure could also hurt many low-income Americans, whose subsidies would fall substantially.
Higher-earning Americans, however, could see their benefits increase significantly. The Congressional Budget Office estimated in March that the Republican bill would mean 24 million fewer people would have health insurance coverage by Since then, Republicans have made significant changes to the bill.
They have also added more funding for programs to cover sick people, a change that could might reduce the number of uninsured. Republicans have not, however, significantly changed the Medicaid provisions of the AHCA, which are also the source of most coverage loss in the CBO report. The nonpartisan agency estimates that 14 million fewer people will have Medicaid by if the AHCA passes.
A Republican leadership aide says that the House has provided the CBO with information on the bill, but there is currently no timeline for when to expect a score. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding. Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all.
Please consider making a contribution to Vox today to help us keep our work free for all. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.
By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. The insurance industry, hospitals, medical advocacy groups such as the American Medical Association, American Heart Association and American Cancer Society, the AARP advocacy group for the elderly and consumer activists opposed the latest bill. The Republican president said later he still had not given up hope that the law would eventually be repealed.
Republicans hold a slim majority in the Senate and. Republicans crafted special rules earlier this year that allowed them to pass a bill with a simple majority in the seat chamber. After those rules expire at the start of the new fiscal year on Sunday, they will need at least 60 votes to advance most legislation.
John Thune, a member of the Republican leadership in the Senate, said the party would likely not try to undo Obamacare again until it was clear there were enough votes for it.
He said the party would now focus on overhauling the U. The big US election issue that's not Trump. Growing numbers of liberal Democrats are coalescing around a universal healthcare plan proposed by Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.
He advocates expanding Medicare, the US government's medical coverage programme for pensioners, to all Americans. Mr Sanders' idea - Medicare for All - would provide healthcare for everyone free of charge. He says it would be funded by higher taxes. Conservatives say the idea would bankrupt the country, but supporters say Americans would save by avoiding the opaque medical fees they currently face, such as insurance premiums, co-payments, deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses.
This video can not be played To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser. Repealing individual mandate. Creating 'skinny' plans. Shortening enrolment. Slashing ads and budgets. Ending cost-sharing reduction payments. Medicaid work requirements. What's the impact? The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. View original tweet on Twitter. What does the existing law do? Some of the more popular provisions include:.
Children can stay on their parent's healthcare plan until age 26 No one who is sick or has a medical condition can be denied insurance Companies can no longer charge women more than men Businesses with more than 50 full-time employees must offer health insurance. Why do conservatives oppose the law? Image source, AFP. The success of the law will depend on how many younger people sign up.
0コメント